Vardan Manukyan vs Thomas Patton Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W L W L
Form
L L L L L L L L W LH2H: Manukyan 1 - 0 Patton
They have played 2 sets in total, with Manukyan winning 2 and Patton winning 0. The last match between Manukyan and Patton was at the M25 Kursumlijska Banja, 06-05-2024, Q2 round, Clay with Vardan Manukyan getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vardan Manukyan | 1 |
| Thomas Patton | 0 |
M25 Kursumlijska Banja(06-05-2024)
7
6
6
3
| Manukyan | Stats | Patton |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (4-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 20 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 49% (31-32) | Career Total W/L | 48% (31-34) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vardan Manukyan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Ilia Simakin
Player
Vardan Manukyan
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Semen Pankin
Player
Vardan Manukyan
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Summers
Player
Vardan Manukyan
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vardan Manukyan
Player
Rafael De Alba
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Thomas Patton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Thomas Patton
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Patton
Player
Mattias Southcombe
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Rae
Player
Thomas Patton
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Thomas Patton
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Patton
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Rae
Player
Thomas Patton
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Thomas Patton
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (31/32) | Win/Loss | 48% (31/34) |
| 50% (67/67) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (68/82) |
| 51% (675/645) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (740/803) |
| 68% (13/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (14/21) |
| 41% (18/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 106 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 42 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 106.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.42 |
| 61% (585/959) | 1st Serve % | 65% (969/1502) |
| 60% (351/585) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (636/969) |
| 44% (164/374) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (242/533) |
| 35% (27/77) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (36/101) |
| 36% (327/917) | Return Points Win % | 33% (453/1353) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (31/32) | Futures W/L | 48% (31/34) |
| 48% (30/62) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (31/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (7/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 33% (3/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (14/20) |
| 85% (34/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (28/24) |
| 15% (34/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (28/4) |
| 7% (29/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (37/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
